考研英语阅读理解题源:Immigration

  留学群考研英语频道为大家提供考研英语阅读理解题源:Immigration,大家可以练习一下自己的阅读能力!

  考研英语阅读理解题源:Immigration

  Immigration

  What have the immigrants ever done for us?

  Rather a lot, according to a new piece of research

  PESKY immigrants. They move to Britain, taking jobs, scrounging welfare benefits, straining health services, overrunning local schools and occupying state-subsidised housing. That, at least, is the story recounted by politicians from the UK Independence Party (UKIP) and, increasingly, by members of the Conservative Party. A new study by two economists tells a very different tale.

  Concern about the economic impact of immigration has centred on two areas: the effect foreigners have on native workers'wages and employment; and the extent to which immigrants, in particular those from countries within the European union   who are free to move around at will, take from a system to which they have contributed little. Research by Christian Dustmann of University College London and Tommaso Frattini of the University of Milan focuses on the second.

  By calculating European immigrants'share of the cost of government spending and their contribution to government revenues, the scholars estimate that between 1995 and 2011 the migrants made a positive contribution of more than 4 billion to Britain, compared with an overall negative contribution of 591 billion for native Britons. Between 2001 and 2011, the net fiscal contribution of recent arrivals from the eastern European countries that have joined the EU since 2004 has amounted to almost 5 billion. Even during the worst years of the financial crisis, in 2007-11, they made a net contribution of almost 2 billion to British public finances. Migrants from other European countries chipped in 8.6 billion.

  The authors point out that the cost of some government services — in particular “ pure public goods ” such as defence spending — remains the same no matter what the population, so the overall cost of providing them to immigrants is zero. Calculate the amount per person, and the price for Britons goes down as the number of immigrants rises, since the cost is shared between a larger number of individuals.

  Immigrants'overall positive contribution is explained in part by the fact that they are less likely than natives to claim benefits or to live in social housing. Between 1998 and 2011 as many as 37% of natives were receiving some kind of state benefit or tax credit; European immigrants were nearly eight percentage points less likely to collect them. Those from Europe were also three percentage points less likely to live in social housing than Britons.

  Mr Dustmann and Mr Frattini acknowledge that the benefits of immigration may be related to the fact that migrants tend to be young. But, they point out, it is likely that many recent migrants will return home, to enjoy their less productive later years — when they may cost the state more in terms of health care, for instance. They also argue that the youth of many recent arrivals means that they are at the beginning of their careers—and may be underemployed because of a lack of language skills, for example — so have not yet reached their full economic potential. The contributions of those who stay in Britain may well increase. It is a new form of foreign direct investment.

  中文对照阅读:

  移民

  移民政策为我们做了些什么?

  根据一项新的研究得出,移民政策做了挺多贡献的

  讨厌的移民者们。他们搬到英国,获得工作,讨要福利,占用卫生服务,挤爆当地学校并且占领保障性住房。至少这是英国独立党和越来越多的保守党成员所讲述的故事。然而两位经济学家的一项新研究却得出了一个完全不同的理论。

  对移民带来的经济影响的关注主要集中在两个方面:一是外国人对当地工人工资和就业率的影响;二是移民们从这样的移民体制中所获益处,尤其是来自欧盟成员国的移民,因为他们可以随意活动,但对所在的移民体系贡献少之又少。由伦敦大学学院的克里斯蒂安·达斯特曼和米兰大学的托马索·弗拉提尼共同合作的调查研究主要就集中于第二点。

  通过计算欧洲移民在政府支出所占份额和他们对政府收益所作的贡献,学者们估计在1995年和2011 年间,相较于英国本国人所做的5910 亿英镑的负面贡献,移民对英国做出了至少40 亿英镑(约合64 亿美元)的正面贡献。在2001 至2011 年间,从自2004 年加入欧盟的东欧国家来的新移民所做的净财政贡献总计50 亿英镑。即便是在金融危机最糟糕的2007至2011 那几年,他们对英国公共财政的净财政贡献也有将近20 亿英镑。从欧洲其它国家来的移民所作贡献零零散散也有86 亿英镑。

  两位作者指出一些政府服务的支出—尤其是例如国防支出等“纯公共”项目—与服务人数毫无关系,因此总体而言,政府在移民身上的此类开销为零。如果要计算英国人均公共服务消费情况,因为移民的加入,这个数值应该还更低,因为分摊的人头数更大。

  总体来产生了积极的影响,有一部分原因是他们比起当地人,不太可能讨得福利或住到公益住房。1998 至2011 年间有高达37%的当地人得到了一些国家福利和税收抵免政策;欧洲移民得到的福利还不到当地人的8 个百分点。这些移民所住的公益住房也不到英国人的3 个百分点。

  达斯特曼和法拉提尼承认移民的好处或许也与移民者趋于年轻化有关。但是,他们指出,似乎最近很多移民都将回到家乡,其中一个原因是他们年老时即使挣得少了,也可以获得更好的卫生保健福利保证晚年幸福。这两位作者还提到新移民中年轻人的到来意味着他们的事业才刚刚开始—比如有的因为语言不通还没有就业—那么他们还没有到完全发挥他们经济潜力的时候。留在英国的移民所做的贡献可能会持续增加。这是一种新形式的外国直接投资。

  

推荐阅读:

  考研英语复习资料

  2015考研英语阅读题源汇总

  2015考研英语阅读复习资料汇总


考研英语大纲 考研英语词汇 英语作文万能句子 考研英语真题 考研英语作文 考研复试英语
分享

热门关注

商务英语专业的考研方向有哪些

商务英语专业考研

考研英语怎么学零基础

考研英语怎么学

考研英语一怎么备考复习

考研英语一

考研英语考试时间多长

考研英语时长

考研英语题型时间安排

考研英语题型时间

2021考研英语阅读理解解题小技巧

考研英语阅读理解解题技巧

2021考研英语:阅读理解的解题步骤

考研英语

2021考研英语阅读理解题型的解题技巧

考研英语阅读理解题型解题技巧

2021考研英语阅读理解题型命题规律

考研英语阅读理解题型命题规律

2021年考研英语:阅读理解的解题绝技

考研英语